New York Supreme Court, 1890

Bermer v. Atlantic Dredging Co.

Bermer v. Atlantic Dredging Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 10, 1890 · Pratt
12 N.Y.S. 181; 65 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 359; 34 N.Y. St. Rep. 632; 58 Hun 359; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3386 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. W. Parker, (Benjamin W. Downing, of counsel,) for appellant. Jaimes & Willcox, (Henry C. Willcox, of counsel,) for respondent.

Bermer v. Atlantic Dredging Co.

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

The, verdict established that the blasting done by defendant at Hell Gate shook the walls of plaintiff’s house inflicting injury. The court •charged that for such injury defendant was responsible, and refused to charge that to make defendant liable it must appear that the work was done in a negligent manner. We think the instruction was correct. If a desirable work cannot be done without shaking down a neighbor’s house, it would ■seem that the work should not be performed, unless the doer was prepared to make compensation for the injury inflicted. That rule seems best to promote ¡the general welfare. The public are not benefited by a change that inflicts an injury greater than the resulting benefit. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.