In re Ciancimino
Opinion of the Court
The appeal herein is from a final order in a special proceeding which awarded costs to the objecting respondents. Costs were taxed, and a postea or judgment added, and judgment was so entered against the petitioner, and an execution has been issued thereon. Against approving the undertaking given upon appeal to stay the execution two objections are urged: First, that the sureties are insufficient; and, second, that the form of the undertaking is not as prescribed by the Code. The first objection is untenable, the sureties upon examination having sufficiently justified. The remaining question is as to the proper form of undertaking to stay execution upon appeal to the general term. Section 1360 of the Code provides that the provisions (title 4, c. 12) relating to perfecting an appeal from an order shall apply. We are thus referred to section 1351 of the Code, which provides that “security is not required to perfect the appeal, but * * * the appeal does not stay the execution of the judgment or order appealed from unless the court in or from which the appeal is taken, or a judge thereof, makes an order directing such a stay. * * * If security is given * * * as a condition of granting the order, the provisions of title 2, c. 12, shall apply.” We are thus again referred to section 1327 of the Code, which is the portion of title 2, c. 12, relating to the question as to the form.'of undertaking. It is evident, therefore, that an undertaking, when required to be given for the purpose of staying an execution upon an appeal to the general term or court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.