New York Supreme Court, 1890

People v. Manhattan Fire Insurance

People v. Manhattan Fire Insurance
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 18, 1890 · Lawbenoe
59 N.Y.S. 1007 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Eugene M. Bernard, for petitioner., John J. Townsend, Jr., for receiver of taxes.

People v. Manhattan Fire Insurance

Opinion of the Court

LAWBENOE, J.

I am of the opinion that the report of the referee in this case should be confirmed, and the exceptions taken thereto overruled. The status of the corporation as to its liability for *1008taxation became fixed on the second Monday of January, 1888. People v. Commissioners of Taxes & Assessments, 91 N. Y. 602; Sisters, of Poor of St. Francis v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 112 N. Y. 677, 20 N. E. 417; Id., 51 Hun, 355, 3 N. Y. Supp. 433; McMahon v. Beekman, 65 How. Prac. 427. The corporation having failed to avail itself of the remedies prescribed by law in cases of illegal assessments for taxation, it is now too late to question either the quantum or the validity of the tax. People v. Wall St. Bank, 39 Hun, 528, 529, and cases cited. In that case Davis, P. J., delivering the opinion of the court, says:

β€œThe law Is thoroughly well settled in this state that the proceedings of the commissioners of taxes and assessments in making assessments for the purposes of taxation, and of the city authorities in levying taxes based on such assessments, are judicial in their nature, and can only be reviewed or questioned in courts by writs of certiorari prosecuted by the parties aggrieved or affected.”

See, also, In re McLean (Sup.) 6 N. Y. Supp. 230; In re Columbian Ins. Co., 3 Abb. Dec. 239.

The case of Central Trust Co. v. New York City & N. R. Co., 110 N. Y. 250, 18 N. E. 92, is a direct authority for the application which is made in this instance, and, inasmuch as the state is entitled to preference over individuals, the creditors of the insolvent corporation have no reason to complain if the debt created by the assessment and tax is directed to be paid.

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.