New York Supreme Court, 1891

Genet v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

Genet v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 11, 1891
13 N.Y.S. 394; 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 989; 59 Hun 624; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1131 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

G. G. Genet, for appellant. F. F. Smith, for respondent.

Genet v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

It was the opinion of the court who heard the appeal in this action that the new trial should be before another referee than the one who had passed upon the issues involved in the action; and, in order that there may be no doubt as to the power of the court to appoint a new referee, the order entered upon the reversal of the judgment should be resettled and amended, by directing that the new trial be had before a new referee to be appointed by the court. Under these circumstances, the appeal taken from the order of the special term should be dismissed, without costs, and the order resettled in the manner suggested.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.