New York Supreme Court, 1891

In re Danziger

In re Danziger
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 13, 1891 · Barrett, Brunt
13 N.Y.S. 401; 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 50; 59 Hun 624; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1139 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

-E. T. Gerry, for appellants. G. Steckler, for respondent.

In re Danziger

Dissenting Opinion

Barrett, J.,

(dissenting.) I think the order should be reversed, and the proceedings remitted to the special term for further action. See my opinion in Re Simon.

Bartlett, J. I concur with Mr. Justice Barrett.

Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.

This case involving the same facts as were presented by In re Simon, ante, 399 (decided herewith,) the order is affirmed, with costs, upon the Opinion in that case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.