New York Supreme Court, 1891

Crawford v. Tyrrell

Crawford v. Tyrrell
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 11, 1891 · Dykman
13 N.Y.S. 951; 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 967; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1753 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James & Thomas H. Tray, for appellant. Johnson & Lamb, for respondents.

Crawford v. Tyrrell

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

This is an action to restrain the defendant from maintaining a house of prostitution, and to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the nuisance. The trial was before a judge without a jury, and he has found the facts which justify the action, and directed a judgment against the defendant, with $300 damages. The testimony is amply sufficient to sustain the judgment upon both the questions involved. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.