New York Supreme Court, 1891

Board of Health v. Valentine

Board of Health v. Valentine
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 11, 1891 · Pratt
14 N.Y.S. 941; 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1019; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles H. Noxon, for appellant. Charles H. Young, for respondent.

Board of Health v. Valentine

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

None of the exceptions have any merit. The charge of the-judge was not excepted to. The questions are all settled by the previous decision, reported 11 N. Y. Supp. .112. The ease of Sturgis v. Spofford, 45 N. Y. 446, has no application, for the reason that the statute there construed gave a single penalty of $100, and it was pointed out by the court that it was. not given for each offense. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.