New York Supreme Court, 1891

Hodgman v. Barker

Hodgman v. Barker
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 16, 1891 · Brunt
16 N.Y.S. 76; 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 773; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 320 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Kelly & MacRae, (Wm. F. MacRae, of counsel,) for appellant. Eugene K. Sackett, for respondent.

Hodgman v. Barker

Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.

The disposition of the case of Bank v. Same Defendant, 16 N. Y. Supp. 75, seems to dispose of this appeal. Notwithstanding the weakness of the papers upon which the plaintiff’s attachment was granted, the appellant cannot succeed upon this appeal, because of the fact, of which this court must take judicial notice, that its attachment has been set aside upon motion of the defendant because of the insufficiency of the papers upon which it was granted, and is therefore no longer in a position to assert any claim to the property upon which the attachment in this action had been levied. We think, therefore, that the appeal must be dismissed, but without costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.