New York Supreme Court, 1891

Smith v. Pelott

Smith v. Pelott
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 30, 1891 · Mayham
16 N.Y.S. 631; 41 N.Y. St. Rep. 953; 62 Hun 618; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2147 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

P. R. Chapman, for appellant. H. D. Bailey, for respondent.

Smith v. Pelott

Opinion of the Court

Mayham, J.

Motion for reargument of this appeal. At the last general term of this court this judgment in this action was affirmed on the argument, without any written opinion by the court. 15 N. Y. Supp. 972. The appellant now moves for a reargument, on the ground that the judgment appealed from was in the nature of a judgment of nonsuit by the referee, and that there is some evidence on the part of the plaintiff raising a question of fact, and that the case should therefore have been considered upon the merits by the referee. Without passing upon the merits of the case, we think, within the case of Forbes v. Chichester, 125 N. Y. 769, 26 N. E. Rep. 914, and upon the facts appearing upon this motion, there should be a reargument of this appeal. Judgment of affirmance vacated. Reargument allowed, with $10 costs of this motion to abide the event of the appeal. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.