New York Supreme Court, 1891

Weill v. Malone

Weill v. Malone
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1891 · Dykman, Pratt
18 N.Y.S. 943; 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 953 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James C. Church, for the motion. Frederic S. Barnum, opposed.

Weill v. Malone

Opinion of the Court

Dykman, J.

This is a motion for a reargument in this court, but there is no reason why the motion should be granted. There was no oversight in making the decision, and the motion should be denied, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Pratt, J.

Upon the case made by the affidavits of both parties, taken together, the attachment was properly dissolved. We do not think it clearly appears that any property has been fraudulently disposed of. Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.