New York Supreme Court, 1891

In re the Judicial Settlement of Accounts of Mills

In re the Judicial Settlement of Accounts of Mills
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 9, 1891 · Barnard
37 N.Y. St. Rep. 706

Counsel

Thos. J. Ritch, Jr., for app’lts; George F. Stackpole, for resp’t.

In re the Judicial Settlement of Accounts of Mills

Opinion of the Court

Barnard, P. J.

An executor or administrator cannot pay the ■assets to the next of kin in advance of the final settlement. If he do so and there be costs and charges put upon the estate in an .action where the executor or administrator failed to recover, the •statute of limitations is no defense to an accounting by the administrator or executor. The executor may be even bound by the statute as between himself and the heir or next of kin; but it has no relevancy to the petitioners’ claim to be paid out of the estate.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Dykhan and Pratt, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.