New York Supreme Court, 1892

Walters v. Kraemer

Walters v. Kraemer
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 8, 1892 · Pratt
17 N.Y.S. 659; 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 4; 63 Hun 628; 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 439 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

George Wallace, for appellant. Albert W. Seaman, for respondent.

Walters v. Kraemer

Opinion of the Court

Pratt, J.

The plaintiff had a right to attach whatever interest the defendant had in the property levied on under the attachment. It is immaterial whether it was proper for plaintiff to file a notice of pendency of action, and index it against Fredericka Kraemer upon this motion, as she has no standing in court sufficient to enable her to bring this appeal. She is neither a party to the suit, nor, so far as appears, has any interest in the subject-matter of the action, nor is she aggrieved by the order appealed from. Watson v. Nelson, 69 N. Y. 539; Code, § 1294; Bank v. Risley, 19 N. Y. 375; Bergen v. Carman, 79 N. Y. 146. Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.