New York Supreme Court, 1892

Van Benthuysen v. New England & Western Railroad

Van Benthuysen v. New England & Western Railroad
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 8, 1892 · Barnard
17 N.Y.S. 709; 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 16; 63 Hun 627; 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 469 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Wingate & Cullen, (George W. Wingate, of counsel,) for appellants. Milton A. Fowler, for respondent Central Hew England & W. R. Co. Simpson, Thacher & Barnum, (Thomas Thacher, of counsel,) for respondent Fidelity Ins., T. & S. D. Co.

Van Benthuysen v. New England & Western Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Barnard, P. J.

The plaintiff had the right to bring the action in case of a refusal by the trustees. The tender was not sufficient to arrest the action, unless it was a tender of all the interest upon the bonds which had nob agreed to postpone their claim to interest. Assuming a default, and the plaintiff’s right to sue, it is not material whether the affairs of the defendant are properly managed. The bondholders are entitled to take possession by a receiver and manage the property. The present management has no right in such a case, even it honest and capable. The order refusing a receiver should be reversed, with costs and disbursements, and the receiver appointed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.