New York Supreme Court, 1892

Allen v. Bank of Key West

New York Supreme Court · Decided March 31, 1892

18 N.Y.S. 391 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Kellogg, Bose & Smith, (L. L. Kellogg, of counsel,) for appellant. BillAngs & Cardoza, (Michael H. Cardozo and Edgar j. Nathan, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the case of Key West Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Bank of Key West, 18 N. Y. Supp. 390, (decided herewith,) we think that the order vacating the attachment should not have been granted. The order should therefore be reversed, with §10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with §10 costs.

All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.