New York Supreme Court, 1892

Wells v. Knox

Wells v. Knox
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 31, 1892
18 N.Y.S. 395; 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 917 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

JBenno Loewy, for appellant. L. H. Hahlo, for respondent.

Wells v. Knox

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

By the pleadings an issue is presented as to whether or not the plaintiff is a creditor of the assignor. The order does not provide for the trial of that issue. The action is for an accounting, and, in disposing of the action, the taking and stating of the account is necessary, and a case is thus presented which the court has the power to refer. Upon such a reference all the issues should have been referred; and as it appears from the terms of the order that the reference was “to take proof of the matters set forth in the pleadings, and take and state the account of the defendant, Thos. B. Knox, as assignee, ” instead of providing for the trial of the issues in addition to the account, the order should be modified by inserting, in lieu of the words, “to take proof of the matters set forth in the pleadings,” the words, “to hear and determine the issues in the action, and to take and state the account,” etc. The order, as so modified, should be affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.