New York Supreme Court, 1892

Round Lake Ass'n v. Kellogg

New York Supreme Court · Decided September 14, 1892 · Herrick, Mayham

20 N.Y.S. 261; 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 668; 65 Hun 622 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James W. Verbeck, (E. Countryman, of counsel,) for appellant. Charles S. Lester, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Herrick, J.

I have examined this case, and it seems to me it should be affirmed. There have already béen three opinions written in it. On the merits the opinions of Judges Putnam and Tappan strike me as sufficient. The general term opinion was to the propriety of a preliminary injunction, and did not reach the merits. I think the judgment should be affirmed.

Affirmed, without opinion.

Concurring Opinion

Mayham, J.

I concur in the above conclusion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.