New York Supreme Court, 1892

Ingersoll v. Dixon

Ingersoll v. Dixon
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 18, 1892 · Brunt
20 N.Y.S. 810; 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 372 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

R. H. Griffin, for appellant. W. C. Beecher, for respondent.

Ingersoll v. Dixon

Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.

We see no reason upon this appeal for interfering with the order made by the court below. The objections made to the defenses sought to be stricken out seem to be principally that they were insufficient as such defenses. We are of opinion that the more orderly course requires that such objections should be raised by demurrer, rather than by motion to strike out. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.