New York Supreme Court, 1892

Clark v. Lude

Clark v. Lude
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 22, 1892 · Putnam
20 N.Y.S. 985 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Thomas F. Wilkinson, for appellant. J. W. Ecker, for respondent.

Clark v. Lude

Opinion of the Court

Putnam, J.

In this case the respondent did not appear on the argument or present any points. I think the order of the county judge granting a new trial should be reversed, with costs, and that no opinion is required. See Morss v. Sherrill, 63 Barb. 21; Cheney v. Railroad Co., 16 Hun, 415. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.