New York Supreme Court, 1892

Pelly v. Naylor

New York Supreme Court · Decided November 18, 1892 · Lawrence

21 N.Y.S. 25; 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 791 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Edward S., Clinch, for appellants., Birdseye, Cloyd & Bayliss, (Lucien Birdseye, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE, J.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of the Same Plaintiff against Onderdonk, 21 N. Y. Supp. 19, we are of the opinion that the judgment and order below should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

VAN BRUNT, P. J., and O’BRIEN, J., concur in result.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.