New York Supreme Court, 1892

Pelly v. Robinson

New York Supreme Court · Decided November 18, 1892 · Lawrence

21 N.Y.S. 25; 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 792 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Edward S. Clinch, for appellant., Birdseye, Cloyd & Bayliss, (Lucien Birdseye, of counsel,) for respondents.

Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE, J.

This case does not differ in any material respect from that of the Same Plaintiff against Onderdonk, 21 N. Y. Supp. 19, and the points presented are the same as are involved in the appeal therein. The judgment and order appealed from must'be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

VAN BRUNT, P. J., and O’BRIEN, J., concur in result.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.