New York Supreme Court, 1892

Van Wagener v. Royce

Van Wagener v. Royce
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 12, 1892 · Dykman
21 N.Y.S. 191; 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 935 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

B. F. Low, for appellants., Greene & Bedell, for respondent.

Van Wagener v. Royce

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is a motion for a reargument of "the appeal of the ■defendants in this action. There is a general statement in the affidavit, •upon which the motion is based, that important facts have been overlooked by this court; but there is no specification of such facts, and we ¿know• of none. On the contrary, the case received a careful examination here, as our opinion will show, and a re-examination has disclosed nothing that was overlooked by us. The motion should be denied, with $10.costs.and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.