New York Supreme Court, 1892

Watson v. Cone

Watson v. Cone
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 12, 1892 · Barnard
21 N.Y.S. 224; 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 508 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. Herbert Watson, (Horace Graves, of counsel,) for appellants., Josiah T. Marean, for respondents.

Watson v. Cone

Opinion of the Court

BARNARD, P. J.

The defendant Smith agreed with the defendant Cone to construct a house on his premises for the sum of $4,300, payable by installments. The first two installments had been paid, and $700 in advance, but without any collusion or intent to defraud thereby. Smith abandoned the contract, and Cone was compelled to pay over $3,000 to finish the house. The first two payments were $2,100. The owner had the right, by contract, to finish the building, and to deduct the expense from the contract price. There was performed, at the abandonment of the contract by Smith, no greater proportion of work to be done than the first two payments bear to the contract price of $4,300. The case of Van Clief v. Van Vechten, 130 N. Y. 571, 29 N. E. Rep. 1017, decides this case against the plaintiffs. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.