New York Supreme Court, 1892

Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Co. v. Noyes

Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Co. v. Noyes
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1892 · Beach
21 N.Y.S. 341; 29 Abb. N. Cas. 115 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William A. Abbott, for the motion., Wilber & Oldham, opposed.

Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Co. v. Noyes

Opinion of the Court

BEACH, J.

I think the following adjudications support this application: Kraft v. Dingee, 38 Hun, 345; Childs v. Tuttle, 48 Hun, 228; Asylum v. Roosevelt, 35 Hun, 501. The averment in the complaint that dealers refused to buy plaintiff’s goods because of defendants’ action is in the nature of an allegation of special damages. Motion granted for specifications of names and addresses.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.