New York Supreme Court, 1893

United States Vinegar Co. v. Spamer

United States Vinegar Co. v. Spamer
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 17, 1893
22 N.Y.S. 410; 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 652; 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 936 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Benno Loewy, for appellant., Ten Eyck & Remington, (S. R. Ten Eyck, of counsel,) for respondent.

United States Vinegar Co. v. Spamer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The question in this case, as to the liability of the defendant, is substantially the same as that discussed in the case of this plaintiff against Schlegel, (22 N. Y. Supp. 407.) and decided at this term of the court. The exceptions are therefore overruled, and judgment for the plaintiff ordered on the verdict, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.