New York Supreme Court, 1893

People v. O'Melia

People v. O'Melia
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1893 · Herrick
22 N.Y.S. 465; 10 N.Y. Crim. 350; 51 St. Rep. 333; 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 333 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Gleason & Dugan, for appellant., James W. Eaton, Dist. Atty., for the State.

People v. O'Melia

Opinion of the Court

HERRICK, J.

This is almost entirely a question of fact. The recorder had the witnesses before him, and could judge of their truthfulness. Whether he kept the house himself, or leased it to another, to be used as a house where people could have unlawful sexual intercourse, he was equally guilty. People v. Erwin, 4 Denio, 129.

The judgment should be affirmed. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.