New York Supreme Court, 1893

Brooke v. Tradesmen's National Bank

Brooke v. Tradesmen's National Bank
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 17, 1893
22 N.Y.S. 633; 68 Hun 129; 75 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 129; 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 31 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Leavitt & Leavitt, (E. R. Leavitt and Charles W. Brooke, of counsel,) for plaintiff., Stern & Rushmore, (C. E. Rushmore, of counsel,) for defendant.

Brooke v. Tradesmen's National Bank

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon an examination of the papers submitted upon this appeal, it is found that no case or bill of exceptions has been made or settled containing the proceedings upon the trial. All that the papers contain are the pleadings, a copy of the clerk’s minutes, and an order directing "the exceptions to be heard, in the first instance, at the general term. It is true that the order contains certain recitals; but they are not in the form of a case or bill of exceptions, which it is necessary should be made in order to bring up the proceedings upon the trial upon this motion for a new trial. There is no appeal from this order, but a motion for a new trial, because of exceptions taken upon the trial; and the proceedings upon the trial are not set out in a case or bill of exceptions, as required by the Code. The case should therefore be stricken from the calendar, in order that the parties may have the proper papers prepared.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.