New York Supreme Court, 1893

Lazarus v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

Lazarus v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 17, 1893
22 N.Y.S. 1106 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Davies, Short & Townsend, (Brainard Tolies and Julien T. Davies, of counsel.) for appellants., Stickney, Spencer & Ordway, (Nelson S. Spencer, of counsel,) for respondents.

Lazarus v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It was the intention of the court, in exacting the stipulation in question, that it should only preclude the railway company from instituting condemnation proceedings in case the judgment should be finally affirmed, but it would not prevent them from instituting such proceedings in case the judgment was reversed. We therefore see no reason for interfering with the order made, and the same should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.