New York Supreme Court, 1893

In re Blewitt

In re Blewitt
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 17, 1893
22 N.Y.S. 1107; 68 Hun 127; 75 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 127; 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 929 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Abram Kling, for appellant., Lorenzo Semple, for respondent.

In re Blewitt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Nothing needs to be added to the opinion of the special term, upon which the order may well be affirmed, except that it appears from the record that the alleged lunatic has escaped from the custody of the committee, and has left the state of New York, and refuses to disclose his whereabouts; so that it is impossible to procure an examination to be made by a disinterested physician as to his present mental condition. We think the order should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.