New York Supreme Court, 1893

Van Etten v. Van Etten

Van Etten v. Van Etten
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 9, 1893 · Herrick
23 N.Y.S. 711; 69 Hun 499; 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 624 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

George Van Etten, for appellant., J. E. & J. C. Van Etten, for respondent.

Van Etten v. Van Etten

Opinion of the Court

HERRICK, J.

It seems to me that title was plainly made an issue in the case by the defendant’s answer, and that the judgment of the county court is correct. The reasons for reversal of the judgment of the justice’s court were satisfactorily and sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the county judge, and I can see no reason for any further opinion. Let the judgment of the county court be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.