Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1893

Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co.

Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 2, 1893 · Herrick
23 N.Y.S. 1146; 67 Hun 653; 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

T. F. Hamilton, for appellant., Smith & Parmenter, (R. A. Parmenter, of counsel,) for respondent.

Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co.

Opinion of the Court

HERRICK, J.

This case presents the same facts as the case of Hoffmann against the same defendant, (22 N. Y. Supp. 463,) the plaintiff in this action being the employer of the plaintiff in that. Both actions arise out of the same accident, and the conclusions arrived at in the Hoffmann Case require that the judgment herein should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Let an order be entered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.