Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1893

Stevens v. Central National Bank of Boston

Stevens v. Central National Bank of Boston
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 9, 1893 · Herrick
23 N.Y.S. 1147; 76 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617; 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 932 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Campbell & Paige, (E. W. Paige, of counsel,) for appellants., Hale & Bulkeley, (Matthew Hale, of counsel,) for respondents.

Stevens v. Central National Bank of Boston

Opinion of the Court

HERRICK, J.

This case has been once before this court, (57 Hun, 499, 11 N. Y. Supp. 268,) upon substantially the same facts. Upon the new trial, the court, in its decision, followed the judgment and opinion of the general term, and I can see no reason for differing from that decision.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

PUTNAM, J., not acting.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.