New York Supreme Court, 1893

Bergin v. Deering

Bergin v. Deering
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 30, 1893
24 N.Y.S. 35; 70 Hun 381; 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 381; 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 894 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James Kearney, for appellant., Nathaniel Levy, for respondent.

Bergin v. Deering

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order adjudging the defendant guilty of -a civil contempt of court. The order does not describe the acts which were committed or omitted by the defendant which constituted the contempt, nor is there any adjudication-that any particular acts were done or omitted which amounted to a contempt. The order does not show what the defendant shall do, or how much he shall pay, if anything, in order to purge himself from contempt, nor is it adjudicated that the acts done or omitted impair the rights of any party to the action. These three provisions -are necessary parts of every order adjudging a party guilty of a civil -contempt.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.