New York Supreme Court, 1893

Bucki v. Bucki

New York Supreme Court · Decided June 30, 1893 · Fee

24 N.Y.S. 374; 70 Hun 598; 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598; 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 287 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Vantlerpoel, Cuming & Goodwin, (Delos McCurdy, of counsel,) for appellant., Howe & Hummel, (Austin G. Fox, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

FEE CURIAM.

The allegations in the complaint, if supported by evidence on the trial, will entitle plaintiff to the judgment prayed for. A situation, therefore, was presented on the motion which authorized the court, in the exercise of a proper judicial discretion, to make an allowance for costs and alimony pending the action. The amount awarded was justified, we think, by the affidavits before the court. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.