New York Supreme Court, 1893

Board of Education v. First National Bank

New York Supreme Court · Decided July 8, 1893 · Herrick

24 N.Y.S. 392; 70 Hun 520 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

C. C. Ormsby, (J. W; Houghton, of counsel,) for appellants., James W. Verbeck, for appellants First Nat. Bank of Richfield, "Williams & Manogue, and Henderson., Smith & Wellington, (Edgar T. Brackett, of counsel,) for respondents.

Opinion of the Court

HERRICK, J.

From an examination of the evidence in this ■case, I am satisfied that there is evidence tending to establish the facts found by the trial court, and I do not feel that I would be .justified in saying that such facts are not supported by the evidence in the case. The facts found by the court not being. disturbed, the conclusions of law found naturally follow. The opinion of the trial court is, in the main, satisfactory, and I see no reason to write another.

Judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.