New York Supreme Court, 1893

Cohen v. Cohen

Cohen v. Cohen
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 13, 1893
25 N.Y.S. 387; 72 Hun 393; 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393; 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 463 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Nathan Lewis, (Samuel Gr. Adams, of counsel,) for appellant., Howe & Hummel, for respondent.

Cohen v. Cohen

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By section 3251 of the Code, a trial fee is allowed for the trial of an issue either of law or fact By section 964, an issue of law or fact can only arise where an answer, demurrer, or reply has been served. There being no answer, demurrer, or reply, no issue of law or fact was joined in this case. The application to the court was a mere application for judgment, and the court simply took proof to determine whether the plaintiff was entitled to judgment.

*388The plaintiff is not entitled to tax a trial fee or costs after ■notice of trial, no such notice being necessary or proper in the progress of the action. The order appealed from, should be reversed, and the clerk’s taxation affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.