New York Supreme Court, 1893

Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court · Decided November 17, 1893 · Brunt

25 N.Y.S. 1045; 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615; 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117; 73 Hun 615 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Hawkins & Delafield, (E. D. Hawkins, of counsel,) for appellant., Chambers & Baughton, (W. P. Chambers, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

VAN BRUNT, P. J.

For the reasons stated in the case of Bryce v. Same Defendant, 25 N. Y. Supp. 1043, (decided herewith,) the judgment should be affirmed, with costs, and with leave to withdraw the demurrer, and answer, on payment of the costs and disbursements of the appeal, and costs in the court below. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.