New York Supreme Court, 1893

Woodhaven Junction Land Co. v. Solly

Woodhaven Junction Land Co. v. Solly
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 1, 1893 · Pratt
26 N.Y.S. 150; 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637; 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 272 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

L. C. Whiton, for appellant., Read, Hatting & Wintner, for respondent Solly., M. L. Towns, for respondent Lange.

Woodhaven Junction Land Co. v. Solly

Opinion of the Court

PRATT, J.

The proof shows that Solly bought the land with the understanding that it could be used for business purposes. We think the court below correctly held that under that description a liquor business should be permitted. It follows that Solly could not be required to accept a deed restricting him from selling liquors. His failure to object at once was sufficiently explained. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.