New York Supreme Court, 1893

Taylor v. Taylor

New York Supreme Court · Decided December 6, 1893 · Herrick

26 N.Y.S. 246; 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 639 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Mills & Bridge, for appellant., Stedman, Thompson & Andrews, (Arthur L. Andrews, of counsel,) for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Walton v. Walton (Neb. 1898)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

HERRICK, J.

I have examined the findings of the referee, and the evidence in this case, and his findings seem to be abundantly supported by the evidence. I am inclined to think that an error was committed by him in refusing to admit the evidence offered, (folio 67 in the case,) but, in view of all the testimony, it seems to me that, if such evidence had been admitted, it ought not to change the result. The behavior of the plaintiff was such as to provoke harsh treatment of her by the defendant. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.