New York Supreme Court, 1893

Aldrich v. Aldrich

Aldrich v. Aldrich
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 6, 1893 · Herrick
26 N.Y.S. 344; 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638; 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 345 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Forrest K. Moreland, for appellant., John M. Kellogg, for respondent.

Aldrich v. Aldrich

Opinion of the Court

HERRICK, J.

Orders of the kind appealed from are very largely in the discretion of the special term. From an examination of the affidavits upon which this order was granted and the pleadings in the case, it does not clearly appear to me that the special term abused the discretion vested in it, and therefore I think that the order appealed from should be affirmed. Let an order be entered accordingly, with $10 costs and printing and other disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.