New York Supreme Court, 1893

People ex rel. Kittredge v. Mabie

People ex rel. Kittredge v. Mabie
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 1, 1893 · Barnard, Pratt
26 N.Y.S. 450; 73 Hun 495; 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 495; 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 460 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Leverett F. Crumb, (Edward Wells, of counsel,) for appellants., Cyrus Wm. Horton, (George F. Canfield and Franklin Couch, of counsel,) for respondents.

People ex rel. Kittredge v. Mabie

Opinion of the Court

PRATT, J.

Section 28, tit. 8, c. 291, Laws 1870, provides, in terms, that its provisions shall only apply to villages incorporated under it. The fact that the legislature in 1873, and again in 1893, passed special acts concerning the village of Poughkeepsie, shows it was not then supposed that the board of supervisors had the powers now claimed. The act of 1884 gives no such powers. The order of the special term must be affirmed, with costs.

DYKMAN, J., concurs.

Dissenting Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.,

(dissenting.) The village of Peekskill was incorporated by special act. No right was given by its charter to increase its territory. Chapter 117, Laws 1883. The general act for the incorporation of villages was only applicable to villages incorporated under its provision. The boards of supervisors had the power -bo extend village limits in such villages as were incorporated under the general act. By chapter 308, Laws 1884, all villages created by special charter were clothed with all power prescribed by the general act for the incorporation of villages within this state, except where the special charter is in conflict with the general law. This section gave the trustees of Peekskill village power to petition for an increase of territory, and the power given to the supervisors to extend or diminish territories in villages under the general law was carried to villages created by special charter through the enactment of 1884. The village limits were therefore properly extended, and the order directing the assessors to vacate the assesssment of relators’ property should be reversed, ■and the writ of certiorari dismissed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.