New York Supreme Court, 1893

Ong Sing v. Hom Mon Dus

Ong Sing v. Hom Mon Dus
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 15, 1893
26 N.Y.S. 1115; 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

W. C. Beecher, for appellant., H. M. Hermann, for respondent.

Ong Sing v. Hom Mon Dus

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The fact that the money was loaned gives no ground of arrest. The only ground upon which this order of arrest can be sustained is that the defendant has fraudulently disposed of his property with intent to defraud his creditors. The allegations in the affidavits wholly fail to set up any facts from which any such conclusion can be drawn, and are therefore wholly insufficient. The order should be reversed, with §10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with §10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.