New York Supreme Court, 1893

Krooks v. L. & C. Wise Co.

Krooks v. L. & C. Wise Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1893 · Patterson
28 N.Y.S. 641; 31 Abb. N. Cas. 46 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John H. V. Arnold, for the motion., Blumenstiel & Hirsch, opposed.

Krooks v. L. & C. Wise Co.

Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, J.

The ex parte order granted on September 28th should be modified by striking out the direction to the sheriff to take into his possession the books of account. The law prescribes what the sheriff must do, and he must act or refuse to act at his peril. The order, as it stands, might well be construed as a direction from the court to break open safes, and destroy property. A new order may be entered, simply directing the sheriff to allow the plaintiff to examine any books in his possession, so far as may be necessary to discover property upon which the attachment may be levied. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.