Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1893

Rutter v. Germicide Co.

Rutter v. Germicide Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 15, 1893 · Brunt, Follett, Parker
77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 403

Counsel

L. J. Morrison, for the appellant., Vernon H. Brown for the respondent.

Rutter v. Germicide Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

In view of the conduct of the defendant in reference to the production of the books under the subpoena duces tecum, we think the granting of the order for examination was justified.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Follett and Parker, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.