New York Supreme Court, 1893

Jacobs v. Howard Insurance

Jacobs v. Howard Insurance
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1893
56 N.Y. St. Rep. 894

Counsel

Hatch & Wiclces, for app'lts ; T. Henry Dewey, for resp’t.

Jacobs v. Howard Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The case seems to have been carefully tried and considered by the learned referee, and the judgment directed by him must, for the reasons assigned in his opinion, be affirmed, with costs. The allowance granted by the special term judge was within the statutory limit, so that there was no abuse of power ; neither was there any abuse of discretion ; hence the order must likewise be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.