New York Supreme Court, 1894

Warsawer v. Hotchkiss

New York Supreme Court · Decided February 12, 1894 · Dykman

27 N.Y.S. 491; 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609; 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

T. Henry Dewey, for appellants., Baldwin F. Strauss, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from so much of an order made at the special term as relates to the name of the agent of the de*493fendants who gave to the assignee of the plaintiff the false and fraudulent information alleged in the third paragraph of the complaint. We think the proper disposition of the case was made at the special term, and that the order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.