New York Supreme Court, 1894

In re Callaghan's Estate

New York Supreme Court · Decided February 12, 1894 · Cullen

27 N.Y.S. 1110; 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609; 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Dailey & Bell (James D. Bell, of counsel), for appellant Metropolitan Brewing Co., Theo. Burgmyer, for appellants Amsdell Bros., T. C. Lyman & Co., and D. M. Koehler., Moffett & Kramer, for respondent Stephen McCabe., John H. Steeriwerth, for respondent John B. Callaghan., John Bradley Lord, special guardian. ., Frank L. Barnard, for Meyer, assignee, etc., Dana & Clarkson, for Katie 0. Callaghan.

Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, J.

This appeal presents the same question decided by this court in 69 Hun, 161, 23 N. Y. Supp. 378, on an appeal from the same decree taken by other creditors. On the authority of that decision the order appealed from must be reversed, and a decree entered for the payment to appellant of its share of the fund, with costs of this appeal to be paid out of the estate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.