New York Supreme Court, 1894

Village of Sandy Hill v. Akin

Village of Sandy Hill v. Akin
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 8, 1894 · Herrick
28 N.Y.S. 889; 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 396 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

D. J. Sullivan, for appellant., G. M. Ingalsbe (A. D. Wait, of counsel), for respondents.

Village of Sandy Hill v. Akin

Opinion of the Court

HERRICK, J.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed. The assessment for personal property against the heirs of a person deceased, without naming them, is void. It does not follow the statute. Cruger v. Dougherty, 43 N. Y. 107; Trowbridge v. Horan, 78 N. Y. 439; Cromwell v. MacLean, 123 N. Y. 474, 25 N. E. 932. AR concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.