New York Supreme Court, 1894

Mutual Life Insurance v. Newell

Mutual Life Insurance v. Newell
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 1894 · Pratt
28 N.Y.S. 913; 85 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 293; 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 241 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

R. E. & A. J. Prime & Burns, for appellant Albert C. Benedict., Miller & Wells (James A. Briggs, of counsel), for respondent.

Mutual Life Insurance v. Newell

Opinion of the Court

PRATT, J.

The right of the mortgagee to protect his interest by payment of taxes, which become a superior lien, depends not upon the covenants in the bond or mortgage, but upon the general principles of equity. It follows that the merger of the bond and mortgage in the judgment has no effect upon the right. The general powers of the court are ample to make such corrections in the judgment as the changed conditions render necessary. We observé that a small amount paid by the mortgagee for insurance against fire was allowed at special term. The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the sum allowed for insurance, and, as thus modified, affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.