New York Supreme Court, 1894

Depierris v. Slavin

Depierris v. Slavin
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 16, 1894
28 N.Y.S. 1106; 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611; 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 881 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. H. Joline, for appellant., G. H. Adams, for respondents.

Depierris v. Slavin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We think that there are subjects of examination pertinent to the cause of action alleged which do not necessarily tend to establish the commission of any criminal offense upon the part of the defendants, and for that reason, there being no other question submitted to us, the order should be affirmed. Davies v. Fish, 35 Hun, 430. The order must be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.