New York Supreme Court, 1894

Kirkwood v. Gehring

Kirkwood v. Gehring
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 1894 · Dykman
28 N.Y.S. 1113; 85 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 233; 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 883 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Magner & Hughes (Thomas F. Magner, of counsel), for appellant, Hurd & Grim (Wm. B. Hurd, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.

Kirkwood v. Gehring

Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of a judge after a trial before him without a jury. No case has been made, and the record contains no evidence except some exhibits. We can base our examination upon nothing but the findings of the judge, which we niust assume are supported and justified by evidence, and upon that assumption they are sufficient to sustain the judgment. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.